Diesel engines have long dominated the off-highway equipment sector, and mobile air compressors are no exception. For over a century, diesel-powered compressors have delivered dependable pneumatic power on construction sites worldwide, cementing their role as essential tools in the industry.
Despite their proven reliability, the environmental impact of diesel engine emissions remains a significant concern in the global push toward net-zero carbon goals. While alternative power options like hydraulic systems and power take-off (PTO) units exist, these solutions typically require the compressor to be mounted on a carrier, limiting their versatility. For truly mobile applications, diesel-powered compressors continue to be the preferred, if not irreplaceable, choice.
Lack of Incentives to Phase Out Older Models
Modern off-highway diesel engines sold in both Europe and the United States meet stringent emissions regulations—specifically, the EU Stage V and U.S. Tier 4 Final standards. However, this regulatory compliance only applies to new machines entering the market. There are currently no mechanisms encouraging the retirement of older compressors with higher emissions.
As a result, many older diesel compressors remain in operation, sometimes for up to 15 years, provided they receive regular maintenance. Some manufacturers offer factory-certified remanufacturing programs for large compressors, which restore units to near-original condition using engines of the same emission tier. While these programs promote a circular economy, they do not reduce overall pollutant emissions.
Industry experts note that government incentives targeting the phase-out of compressors with outdated engines could significantly lower the sector’s carbon footprint.
Exploring Alternative Power Sources
Equipment manufacturers are actively investigating alternative power systems for mobile compressors. Hydrogen combustion shows potential in the broader off-highway machinery landscape, but electrification is currently the primary focus.
One major challenge for battery-electric (BE) compressors lies in fitting batteries within existing equipment footprints. Though technically feasible, incorporating batteries significantly increases both the weight and cost of the units. Additionally, BE compressors face “range anxiety” related to duty cycles and recharging needs—especially for screw-type compressors used in demanding, continuous-operation environments. These factors cast doubt on the widespread adoption of BE power in mobile compressors.
Electric Power from the Grid: Opportunities and Limitations
Aside from batteries, electric compressors can also operate using grid power or external power banks, a practice already in limited use. However, this approach limits mobility—a critical factor for compressors on construction sites—and introduces practical issues, such as trip hazards from power cables.
Another significant concern is the electrical current available on-site. Compressors generally require a minimum 63-amp service to run at full power, but many construction locations only provide 32-amp or even 16-amp service. While variable speed drive (VSD) technology can adjust performance to lower amperages, output and efficiency inevitably decline.
The Road Ahead for Mobile Compressors
As the industry advances toward net-zero emissions, mobile air compressor manufacturers will continue to explore alternatives to diesel power, including electrification. Nevertheless, current technological and operational challenges suggest that diesel engines will remain integral to mobile compressors for the foreseeable future.
Related topics: